Successive Limited Comparisons (Branch)

1b Selection of value goals and empirical analysis of the needed action are not distinct from one another but are closely intertwined.

2b Since means and ends are not distinct, means-end analysis is often inappropriate or limited.

3b The test of a 'good' policy is typically that various analysts find themselves directly agreeing on a policy (without their agreeing that it is the most appropriate means to an agreed objective).

4b Analysis is drastically limited:

(i)            Important possible outcomes are neglected.

(ii)           Important alternative potential policies are neglected.

(iii)          Important affected values are neglected.

5b A succession of comparisons greatly reduces or eliminates reliance on theory.

Assuming that the root method is familiar and understandable, we proceed directly to clarification of its alternative by contrast. In explaining the second, we shall be describing how most administrators do in fact approach complex questions, for the root method, the 'best' way as a blueprint or model, is in fact not workable for complex policy questions, and administrators are forced to use the method of successive limited comparisons.